UNITED STATES RULINGS UPDATED

INTERNATIONAL RULING: INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Final Legal Notices

AVIS Juridique Final

No 2023/777 21 Avril 2023

GREETINGS, pursuant to the Rome Statutes, the International Responsibility to Protect Statutes and United Nations Security Council Resolution 2733, notice is hereby the International Court of Justice has jurisdiction over these matters pertaining to the International Complaint recorded 27 August 2012, by the Honorable Anthony C. L. Blair, Barrister of the United Kingdom on behalf of the Honorable, Phillip B. Sutton, DBA & PhD, of the United States of America.

Pursuant to the operation of International Law, the International Tribunals grant Complainants before the Courts protection from any government authority or jurisdiction in their home nations. Dr. Sutton's International Complaint was initiated after the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama failed to adequately and appropriately address violent crimes against thousands of U.S. Citizens, culminating in the deaths of at least 42 fellow human beings in Iraq, Libya and the United States and the paid political assassination attempt against Dr. Sutton himself on 5 April 2012.

Further, the International Tribunals can entertain civil actions against noncomplying nations who have knowingly allowed egregious criminal activities against innocent citizens such as Dr. Sutton and compensate him or her appropriately for physical, emotional and mental duress and reputational and actual physical damages to the body or property.

Therefore, the International Tribunals have and will continue to initiate civil and prosecutorial proceedings when there is reason to believe that a Nation’s governance has knowingly and willfully allowed civil and criminal offenses against its innocent citizens. This interference includes but is not limited to intimidation or other instances and potential instances of tampering with witnesses and evidence; refusing to recognize the jurisdiction of the Courts; cooperate with and answer questions of the International Courts, their Representatives or Representatives of Complainants; refusal to produce documents and other relevant evidence; and breaching protective measures for its citizens. Cases of this kind before the International Tribunals fall under Rules 1 through 87 inclusive of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence.

The United States of America, its elected officials and their appointees in the Barack H. Obama, Donald J. Trump and Joseph R. Biden Administrations have:

Count I: Knowingly allowed domestic terrorists to commit over 350 million Crimes Against Humanity and United States Federal Felonies and millions of lesser crimes to be committed against Dr. Sutton with impunity. These crimes continue to this day.

Count II: Dr. Sutton is joined by over 10,000 innocent fellow victims in having corrupt judicial systems and law enforcement systemically ruin their lives with impunity. The crime spree continues to this day.

Count III: One-hundred and nineteen women were sexually assaulted in Missoula County, Montana, USA, in 2010 and 2011. Only one rapist has been convicted of the crime. The Obama Administration ostensibly held a year-long investigation of these offenses and nothing significant was discovered to solve these crimes.

Later, International and Private Investigators established that the U.S. Justice declined to prosecute any of the crimes committed referred to in Counts I through III in the case even though ample evidence existed for prosecution. No explanation was ever given for this.

Count IV: After Dr. Sutton exhausted his domestic legal remedies, he recorded his Complaint with the International Tribunals. His Complaint is the first of its kind and a landmark event. To counteract the threat to its re-election in 2012, the Obama Administration concocted the raid of its consulate in Benghazi, Libya on 11 September 2012. U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, and U.S. government personnel Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty died in an attack at the Mission.

Investigations concerning Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi indicated that the elements within U.S. government itself collaborated with al Qaeda-gate terrorists in the attack and it was meant to deflect media interest away from Dr. Sutton’s Complaint. The Obama-Biden ticket successfully won re-election and little or no media coverage has ever been given Dr. Sutton’s complaint this entire past decade.

Indeed, these facts were discovered when the International Criminal Court’s file on Mr. Gaddafi was under its last review before retirement in May 2020 and therein were reports American journalists threatened their foreign counterparts if they reported the truth about Benghazi.

Count V: State of Montana Attorney General Steve Bullock, Missoula County Attorney Fred Van Valkenburg and Missoula City Attorney Jim Nugent repressed squad car videos of Dr. Sutton’s beating by Missoula Police Officer Kurt Trowbridge and ignored pictures taken by a Montana State Investigator of Dr. Sutton’s injuries. When US Attorney General Eric Holder responded in kind, that is when Dr. Sutton recorded his International Complaint against the United States of America.

In 2015, two Missoula Women came forward and stated that Bullock’s office had paid them hush money to keep their private videos of the third attempt on Dr. Sutton’s Life by Missoula law enforcement quiet. This triggered additional revelations that Mr. Trowbridge had been paid by University of Montana President Royce Engstrom to assassinate Dr. Sutton. Mr. Trowbridge still wears a badge. How can that be?

Count VI: In early September 2017, former Montana Insurance Bureau Chief Jeannie Keller fabricated a series of prevarications and nebulous difficulties with renewal of Dr. Sutton’s Professional Insurance Licenses. It is illegal to deny professional licensing on some amorphic feeling about someone, especially when Dr. Sutton has such an exemplary record of service to the public over 32 years in the financial services industry.

The International Prosecutor’s office knows Ms. Keller was paid to do this as part of the insurance kickback scandals which broke in spring of 2019 through the Australian Parliament Report. Christchurch terrorist Brenton Tarrant named Ms. Keller and her boss, then-Montana State Auditor, Matt Rosendale, as western contacts and confirmed the kickback scandals that are known to exist now in the American political subdivisions of the states of Colorado, Georgia, Montana and North Carolina and the District of Columbia.

Further, it is a known quantity that Mr. Rosendale has unethically colluded with Insurance Executives to undo reforms by a quarter century of Consumerist Montana State Auditors and put thousands of Montanans at risk unnecessarily.

Count VII: On 14 July 2019, the International Prosecutor’s Office issued a brief Report regarding another assassination attempt upon Dr. Sutton’s life. Known al Qaeda operatives Oleksander and Kateryna Kushnir from Ukraine poisoned Dr. Sutton with a WMD-derivative compound on 21 June 2019, in Colorado Springs, Colorado.

The Kushnirs implicated Colorado officials who had at least prior knowledge of the plot if not actually involved. This is confirmed by the fact that Colorado State Administrative Judge Matthew E. Norwood had ruled against Dr. Sutton’s application for Professional Insurance Licensure on 11 June 2019, but the notification letter was not sent until 2 July 2019.

In a convoluted letter written by Operations Specialist Christine Gonzales-Ferrer dated 1 July 2019, from Colorado Insurance Commissioner Michael Conway’s office, Dr. Sutton was given 20 days to respond after the ruling or lose everything. 1 July was that 20^th day and she sent it on 2 July, thus denying Dr. Sutton his human and civil rights for the nth time in this particular case.

Ms. Gonzales-Ferrer further wrote Dr. Sutton he had an additional 30 days from date of the letter to respond, quoting from a separate statute. The only aspect that explains the three-week delay is the Colorado al Qaeda operatives anticipated Dr. Sutton would be dead and would not have to bother. When they discovered Dr. Sutton survived, they had to cover-up their plot.

Count VIII: On 11 June 2020, International Chief Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda and Phankiso Mochochoko, Director of Jurisdiction, Complementarity & Cooperation Division with the International Criminal Court were sanctioned by the United States of America for investigating alleged War Crimes by United States soldiers in Afghanistan. The soldiers in question had been court-martialed and then pardoned by Mr. Trump. The ICC had every right to pursue its duties in Afghanistan under International Law, yet it was subjected to childish epithets and absurd questions of legitimacy and jurisdiction.

To add insult to injury, Mr. Biden quickly rescinded almost all of Mr. Trump’s Executive Orders after he took office on 20 January 2021. One notable exception was rescinding these sanctions. It was not until 2 April 2021 that Mr. Biden lifted the Sanctions without any apologies to the ICC.

National Leaders cannot pick and choose when they and their citizens will obey International Law any more than they can pick and choose to obey their own country’s laws at any level of jurisdiction. The implications which are emanating from the United States of America are that they can. This kind of brazen insolence towards International Law cannot be helpful in creating a true International Justice System.

Dr. Sutton and his fellow victims have suffered horribly through these predatory criminals and terrorists and the U.S. government has utterly failed to protect them from this abuse as required by International Law. This court’s U.S. district court partners concur.

Hence forth, any act towards Dr. Sutton, SVC or their representatives which qualifies under the United Nations Security Council Resolutions of 22 January and 27 January 2014 as act of terrorism, act of disrespect or defiance of International Law will not be tolerated and will be subject to minimum punishment as set forth by International Tribunals and Chief International Prosecutor no matter who the offender may be.

The United States of America was once the model to the rest of the world in how compliance with International Law should be conformed with by any nation. Today, it is just the opposite with only the Russian Federation having a worse record of compliance with International Law.

Therefore, and whereas, Dr. Sutton is hereby granted a Judgment for ten times the amount of the annual projected economic output of the United States of $25 trillion in 2023 or the sum of $250 trillion. Beginning on the above date, each month the Sutton International Complaint remains open and Justice therein denied, a 10% interest penalty will be charged until it is so. It is so Ordered.