COLORADO & MONTANA RULINGS UPDATED | SVC Trailblazer Publications

INTERNATIONAL RULINGS: INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT UPDATE

COLORADO

Final Legal Notices

Avis Juridique Final

No 2023/777 Le 21 Avril 2023

GREETINGS, pursuant to the Rome Statutes and the International Responsibility to Protect Statutes notice was given and is hereby reiterated that the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court has assumed jurisdiction over all matters pertaining to the International Complaint recorded 27 August 2012, by the Honorable Anthony C. L. Blair, Barrister of the United Kingdom on behalf of the Honorable, Phillip B. Sutton, DBA & PhD, of the United States of America.

Pursuant to the operation of International Law, the International Tribunals grant Complainants before the Courts protection from any government authority or jurisdiction in their home nations. Dr. Sutton's International Complaint was initiated after the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama failed to adequately and appropriately address violent crimes against thousands of U.S. Citizens, culminating in the deaths of at least 42 fellow human beings in Iraq, Libya and the United States and the paid political assassination attempt against Dr. Sutton himself on 5 April 2012.

International Tribunals have and will continue to initiate civil and prosecutorial proceedings when there is reason to believe that a person has knowingly and willfully interfered with the Administration of Justice. This interference includes but is not limited to intimidation or other instances and potential instances of tampering with witnesses and evidence; refusing to recognize the jurisdiction of the Courts; cooperate with and answer questions of the International Courts, their Representatives or Representatives of Complainants; refusal to produce documents; and breaching protective measures. Cases of this kind before the International Tribunals fall under Rule 77 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence.

The State of Colorado, a political subdivision of the United States of America, its elected officials and their appointees are hereby found guilty by the International Tribunals on the following counts:

Count I: The State of Colorado knowingly feigned an unnecessary investigation of Dr. Sutton. The investigation was conducted with the criminal intent of denying him Life and Health Insurance Licensure when he had earned it under law and thereby violating his human rights to continue practice in a career that had span 32 Years without Consumer complaint in Colorado (1985-89) and the State of Montana (1990-2017), another political subdivision of the United States of America.

Count II: The State of Colorado’s Steven Giampaolo unlawfully withheld the nature of the investigation from Dr. Sutton. It goes without saying that this is a fundamental human right inviolable. This act constitutes a form of criminal defamation and intimidation.

Count III: The State of Colorado’s Angela Seaberg published a criminally defaming and criminally intimidating letter of denial with the sole purpose of deterring Dr. Sutton's continued efforts to gain licensure not only in Colorado, but anywhere in the United States and irreparably harmed Dr. Sutton's professional and personal reputation and opportunities to financially support himself and his family.

Further, the delays in the licensure process have not only caused the severest financial hardship for Dr. Sutton and his Family, but also handicapped the transition and establishment of a normal lifestyle for the entire family. The International Tribunals will make sure Dr. Sutton and his family will be fully compensated by the State of Colorado for their financial losses, disgrace, mental anguish and suffering.

Count IV: The State of Colorado breached a contract with and perpetrated a fraud upon Dr. Sutton while accusing him of defrauding it. Such turnabout is not fair play and is definite cause for civil action and criminal prosecution. It would be a very difficult case for the State of Colorado to prove it ever intended to treat Dr. Sutton impartially and lawfully.

Counts V-VII: On three separate occasions requests were made for copies of Dr. Sutton's Personal File and denied. Such requests are simply crucial and essential to the administration of justice of any kind. Colorado’s Appellant Procedure denies Dr. Sutton his basic rights to confront the witnesses and evidence against him.

It is unfathomable why the State of Colorado chose to deny Dr. Sutton's rights so callously, ruthlessly and diabolically. This is an outrage on its face and painfully patent as to what has truly transpired here.

Colorado State bureaucrats Matthew Norwood, Marguerite Salazar, Michael Conway, Steven Giampaolo, Angela Seaberg appointed by Colorado Governors John Hickenlooper and Jared Polis, who are legally responsible for their acts; and Peter Frigo and Karl Kaesmeyer appointed by the State’s Attorney General Phil Weiser, and likewise is legally responsible for their acts, can most certainly are convicted of International Human Rights violations by the International Tribunals for failing to disclose the contents of an insurance license applicant's Personal File!

Count VIII: The State of Colorado has commissioned and/or condoned the 24/7 harassment of Dr. Sutton.

Counts IX-XII: The last four pieces of correspondence from the State of Colorado have been sorry attempts to regain control and press its appellate procedure as valid. For reasons already illuminated, the Colorado Administrative Courts do not afford due process as it purports to do in 24-4-105 C.R.S.

The Court recognizes Colorado Insurance Commissioner Michael Conway’s particular vicious criminal animus towards Dr. Sutton as he intentionally and with malice declined Dr. Sutton’s Licensure Application on 27 August 2019, Dr. Sutton’s 60^th birthday.

The Hague's Partner U.S. District Courts have stated that the process is unconstitutional and does not meet the standards for due process set forth in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. All rulings by the State of Colorado in this matter are hereby struck down and are of no force and effect.

Further, the documents state that Dr. Sutton has not responded to the Administrative Court and was in default. Dr. Sutton's Representatives do not appreciate being ignored and not recognized as such. Dr. Sutton has indeed responded and incontrovertibly argued that he should have had received his Professional Insurance Licenses no later than 5 December 2018.

Likewise, the International Tribunals are disgusted with the continued and arrogant criminal insolence shown them by the State of Colorado. No other legitimate Court would tolerate it, why should The Hague? The International Tribunals have jurisdiction in this subcase and there will be no further discussion about it.

Counts XIII-CCIX: 197 Colorado Licensees that the undersigned has knowledge of have received their licenses under similar circumstances Seaberg complained about in her denial letter to Dr. Sutton. Normally, these letters outline what the applicant must do to fulfill licensure requirements, not the instrument of character assassination that Seaberg morphed it into. She further effectively and without good cause appearing terminated Dr. Sutton’s 32-year career in financial Services.

The International Tribunals directed the State of Colorado to issue Dr. Sutton's Professional Insurance Licenses by 2 April 2019. After Colorado failed to do so, the International Court of Justice levied a Default Judgment of $3,150,784,000 on 5 April 2019. The Judgment(s) amount(s) have been be enhanced by up to a multiple of ten per diem as long as Colorado withholds Dr. Sutton's duly earned licenses beginning 21 May 2019.

The State Colorado was to issue Dr. Sutton’s Professional Insurance Licenses with all due dispatch to reduce the civil liabilities against the public treasury and the perpetrators’ personal assets; criminal penalties against the perpetrators; and ignominy brought upon the State of Colorado itself. The State of Colorado chose not to do so with distressing consequences appertaining for the State of Colorado.

On 14 July 2019, the International Prosecutor’s Office issued a brief Report regarding another assassination attempt upon Dr. Sutton. Known al Qaeda operatives Oleksander and Kateryna Kushnir from Ukraine poisoned Dr. Sutton with a WMD-derivative compound on 21 June 2019, in Colorado Springs. Dr. Sutton spit out the poison, but not before it caused 25 square inches of puss sacks to form in his mouth. He lost over 20 pounds but has achieved remission.

The Kushnirs implicated Colorado officials had at least prior knowledge of the plot if not actually involved. This is confirmed by the fact that Mr. Norwood had ruled against Dr. Sutton on 11 June 2019, but the notification letter was not sent until 2 July 2019.

In a convoluted letter written by Operations Specialist Christine Gonzales-Ferrer dated 1 July 2019, from Mr. Conway’s office, Dr. Sutton was given 20 days to respond after the ruling or lose everything. 1 July was that 20^th day and she sent it on 2 July, thus denying Dr. Sutton his human and civil rights for the nth time.

Gonzales-Ferrer the further wrote Dr. Sutton he had an additional 30 days from date of the letter to respond, quoting from a separate statute. The only aspect that explains the three-week delay is the Colorado al Qaeda operatives anticipated Dr. Sutton would be dead and would not have to bother. When they discovered Dr. Sutton survived, they had to cover-up their plot. There is simply no other plausible explanation.

This is all the proof the Court needs to conclude that the State of Colorado never intended to license Dr. Sutton no matter how stellar his application. No private organization nor government agency can bait a qualified applicant to proceed through the duly set processes to earn a college degree, professional certification or professional license and then reject a candidate’s degree, certification and/ licensure application without any intent of granting the degree, certificate or license, which the State of Colorado clearly did in this case. The evidence in this case is incontrovertible and the State of Colorado cannot continue to have these powers. These powers are hereby revoked.

Furthermore, Ms. Seaberg’s actions in regard to forestalling any attempt by Dr. Sutton to achieve licensure in any state is a vicious personal attack on Dr. Sutton and was a blatant attempt to destroy his 32-year career in Financial Services.

This court and its partner U.S. federal courts have ruled that if Dr. Sutton cannot be licensed in the State of Colorado no one can. Accordingly, all professional licensing done by the State of Colorado is hereby revoked and those licensed by the State of Colorado cannot be licensed anywhere else in the United States, thus their careers are abruptly terminated as Dr. Sutton’s. Ms. Seaberg, et al, will be hereby tasked with the explanation why.

Count CCX: The Citizens of Colorado have made it quite clear that they do not want Dr. Sutton in their midst and made it nearly impossible for him to reside in the State of Colorado. Dr. Sutton has been denied repeatedly his right to vote, attain income on which to live, attain driver's licenses for himself and his teenagers and the use and have access to public facilities and services as all citizens have the right to do, thus violating all aspects of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Count CCXI: The Kushnirs easily escaped Colorado and the United States were not apprehended until they were miles from home in Crimea by the Russian Federation. Attempted murder convictions have been adjudged against the guilty parties and those who appointed them by the International Criminal Court. The Court will pass sentence at a time and place of its own choosing under Rule 145 of Rules & Evidence.

Count CCXII: The people of Colorado are brazenly and flagrantly unappreciative of what Dr. Sutton has done for the state. Hence- forth, any act towards Dr. Sutton, SVC or their representatives which qualifies under the United Nations Security Council Resolutions of 22 January and 27 January 2014 as act of terrorism, act of disrespect or defiance of International Law will not be tolerated and will be subject to minimum punishment as set forth by International Tribunals and Chief International Prosecutor no matter who the offender may be.

Count CCXIII: State of Colorado and three county governments have intentionally denied citizenship to Dr. Sutton and members of family and all the rights appertaining for four years. The State of Colorado is hereby partitioned in the manner prescribed by the United Nations.

Dr. Sutton and his business affiliates have created nearly 28,350 jobs and $1.1 trillion in gross domestic product the past 20 years. If these economic contributions are not appreciated then there must be a return on Dr. Sutton’s investment at least equal to these economic contributions. Therefore and whereas, Dr. Sutton is hereby granted a Judgment for twenty times the amount of his economic contributions in the sum of $22 trillion dollars.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MONTANA

Final Legal Notices

Avis Juridique Final

No 2023/777 Le 14 Mars 2023

International Tribunals have and will continue to initiate civil and prosecutorial proceedings when there is reason to believe that a person has knowingly and willfully interfered with the Administration of Justice. This interference includes but is not limited to intimidation or other instances and potential instances of tampering with witnesses and evidence; refusing to recognize the jurisdiction of the Courts; cooperate with and answer questions of the International Courts, their Representatives or Representatives of Complainants; refusal to produce documents; and breaching protective measures. Cases of this kind before the International Tribunals fall under Rule 77 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence.

The State of Montana, a political subdivision of the United States of America, its directly-elected Auditor and his appointees are hereby found guilty by the International Tribunals on the following counts:

Count I: The State of Montana knowingly feigned an unnecessary investigation of Dr. Sutton. The investigation was conducted with the criminal intent of denying him Life and Disability (Health) Insurance Licensure when he had earned it under law and thereby violating his rights to continue practice in a career that had span 32 Years without Consumer complaint in Colorado (1985-89), another political subdivision of the United States of America, and the State of Montana (1990-2017).

Count II: The State of Montana’s Jeannie Keller unlawfully withheld the nature of the investigation from Dr. Sutton. It goes without saying that this is a fundamental human right inviolable. This act constitutes a form of criminal defamation and intimidation.

Count III: Ms. Keller conducted a criminally defaming and criminally inquisition with the sole purpose of deterring Dr. Sutton's continued efforts to gain licensure and irreparably harming Dr. Sutton's professional and personal reputation and opportunities to financially support himself and his family.

Professional Licenses in almost any field are great credentials for Authors, Public Speakers, Professional Consultants, Educators and Trainers to have. Being disgraced like this has cost Dr. Sutton far more income in these areas than he ever hoped to make in selling insurance. The damage has been done and continues to be done as Dr. Sutton continues to be disbarred. The International Tribunals will make sure Dr. Sutton will be fully compensated by the State of Montana for his financial losses, disgrace, mental anguish and suffering.

Count IV: It would be a very difficult case for the State of Montana to prove it ever intended to treat Dr. Sutton impartially and lawfully. No private organization nor government agency can bait a qualified applicant to proceed through the duly set processes to earn or renew a college degree, professional certificate or professional license and then reject a candidate’s degree, certification and/ licensure application without any intent of granting or renewing the degree, certificate or license, which the State of Montana clearly did in this case. The evidence in this case is incontrovertible and the State of Montana cannot continue to have these powers for insurance and securities licensure. These powers are hereby revoked.

The Office of Montana State Auditor under the State of Montana Constitution, Article VI, and other sections appertaining are hereby repealed.

Counts V-VII: On three separate occasions requests were made for copies of Dr. Sutton's Personal File and denied. Such requests are simply crucial and essential to the administration of justice of any kind. Montana’s Appellant Procedure denies his basic rights to confront the witnesses and evidence against him.

It is unfathomable why the State of Montana chose to deny Dr. Sutton's rights so callously, ruthlessly and diabolically. This is an outrage on its face and painfully patent as to what has truly transpired here.

Former Montana State Auditor Matt Rosendale (2017-2021) and his Montana State bureaucratic appointees Jeannie Keller, Mary Arnold and Michael Kakuk can most certainly are convicted of contempt for the International Tribunals for failing to disclose the contents of an insurance license applicant's Personal File.

Count VIII: The State of Montana had commissioned and/or condoned the 24/7 harassment of Dr. Sutton.

Hence forth, any act towards Dr. Sutton, SVC or their representatives which qualifies under the United Nations Security Council Resolutions of 22 January and 27 January 2014 as act of terrorism, act of disrespect or defiance of International Law will not be tolerated and will be subject to minimum punishment as set forth by International Tribunals and Chief International Prosecutor no matter who the offender may be.

Count IX: The Hague's Partner U.S. District Courts have stated that the Montana’s Appellate process is unconstitutional and does not meet the standards for due process set forth in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. All rulings by the State of Montana in this matter are hereby struck down and are of no force and effect.

Counts X-MIX: Montana incorrectly handles a minimum of 1,000 insurance agent appointments a year. When Ms. Keller informed Dr. Sutton he had a problem, he corrected the situation in just two hours. Simply outstanding. Yet, Keller insisted on asking Dr. Sutton for information that he knew would violate his confidentiality commitments with his clients, fellow agents and companies without explanation as to why.

The Hague and their Partner Federal Courts have Ruled that the State of Montana Auditor's Office has habitually erred in keeping accurate records of Agent Appointments and disbarred over 3,500 Licensees the past six ears as a result, SVC's President included.

Ms. Keller fabricated this into some nebulous difficulty with renewal of Dr. Sutton’s licenses. It is illegal to deny professional licensing on some amorphic feeling about someone, especially when Dr. Sutton has such an exemplary record of service to the public.

Count MX: The International Prosecutor’s office knows Ms. Keller was paid to do this as part of the insurance kickback scandals which broke in spring of 2019. Christchurch terrorist Brenton Tarrant named Rosendale as a western contact and further confirmed the kickback scandals that are known to exist now in the American political subdivisions of Colorado, District of Columbia, Georgia, Montana and North Carolina.

Further, it is a known quantity that Rosendale has unethically colluded with Insurance Executives to undo reforms by a quarter century of Consumerist Montana State Auditors and put thousands of Montanans at risk unnecessarily.

The International Tribunals directed the State of Montana to issue Dr. Sutton's Professional Insurance Licenses by 16 March 2018. After the State of Montana failed to do so and further unexpected difficulties arose regarding Dr. Sutton’s licensure, the International Court of Justice levied a Default Judgment of $11,550,000,000 on 5 April 2019. The Judgment(s) amount(s) have been be enhanced by up to a multiple of ten per diem as long Montana continues to withhold Dr. Sutton's duly earned licenses beginning 21 May 2019.

The State of Montana was to issue Dr. Sutton’s Professional Insurance Licenses with all due dispatch to reduce the civil liabilities against the public treasury and the perpetrators’ personal assets; criminal penalties against the perpetrators; and ignominy brought upon the State of Montana itself.

Otherwise, our partner U.S. District Court(s) will Order Montana/NIPR to publish Dr. Sutton’s licenses in due course. Once Dr. Sutton has his Professional Insurance Licenses in hand, the total amount of the combined Judgments will become known and service and execution of the civil judgments will commence.